<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily WTF maliciously infringes Programming Praxis trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/</link>
	<description>A collection of etudes, updated weekly, for the education and enjoyment of the savvy programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 03:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a button on my site that says &quot;Contact Us&quot; which a lot of other sites stole from me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a button on my site that says &#8220;Contact Us&#8221; which a lot of other sites stole from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Programming from google blogs as of August 20, 2009 « tryfly.com</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Posts about Programming from google blogs as of August 20, 2009 « tryfly.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in, or is pretty good at. I am familiar with the following: PERL C/C++ PHP(some) Javascript.   The Daily WTF maliciously infringes Programming Praxis trademark &#8230; &#8211; programmingpraxis.com 08/20/2009 The Daily WTF, a web site that chronicles “curious [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in, or is pretty good at. I am familiar with the following: PERL C/C++ PHP(some) Javascript.   The Daily WTF maliciously infringes Programming Praxis trademark &#8230; &#8211; programmingpraxis.com 08/20/2009 The Daily WTF, a web site that chronicles “curious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sorryoldman</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sorryoldman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Phil,
The name is changed to Programming Practice!!
I think Alex either admitted his mistake to himself or bowed to public opinion.
More than anything else, I hope this becomes another outstanding example of internet justice in the programmer community.

To all the unscrupulous webmasters and LLC&#039;s out there:

The lesson is that your brand is of no use before public opinion on the internet.
On the internet, once a thief, always a thief. Don&#039;t steal and expect to get away with it. It will come back to haunt you. Ignore at your own risk.
If you find something cool and want to copy, copy the concept, that is allowed in software.
Give credit where it is due. Link back correctly where required.

Kudos to the Proggit community. This is a much-needed show of power for a good cause.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Phil,<br />
The name is changed to Programming Practice!!<br />
I think Alex either admitted his mistake to himself or bowed to public opinion.<br />
More than anything else, I hope this becomes another outstanding example of internet justice in the programmer community.</p>
<p>To all the unscrupulous webmasters and LLC&#8217;s out there:</p>
<p>The lesson is that your brand is of no use before public opinion on the internet.<br />
On the internet, once a thief, always a thief. Don&#8217;t steal and expect to get away with it. It will come back to haunt you. Ignore at your own risk.<br />
If you find something cool and want to copy, copy the concept, that is allowed in software.<br />
Give credit where it is due. Link back correctly where required.</p>
<p>Kudos to the Proggit community. This is a much-needed show of power for a good cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClaudeSuck.de</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClaudeSuck.de]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://bonsaicode.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/programming-praxis-who-owns-the-zebra/
http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/Python/comp.lang.python/2009-06/msg00319.html
http://devmeat.com/show/4985705
http://swik.net/Haskell/del.icio.us+tag%2Fhaskell/Programming+Praxis+%E2%80%93+Monte+Carlo+factorization+%C2%AB+Bonsai+Code/cztfe
http://www.pubbs.net/python/200905/131284/

and so on

hmm...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bonsaicode.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/programming-praxis-who-owns-the-zebra/" rel="nofollow">http://bonsaicode.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/programming-praxis-who-owns-the-zebra/</a><br />
<a href="http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/Python/comp.lang.python/2009-06/msg00319.html" rel="nofollow">http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/Python/comp.lang.python/2009-06/msg00319.html</a><br />
<a href="http://devmeat.com/show/4985705" rel="nofollow">http://devmeat.com/show/4985705</a><br />
<a href="http://swik.net/Haskell/del.icio.us+tag%2Fhaskell/Programming+Praxis+%E2%80%93+Monte+Carlo+factorization+%C2%AB+Bonsai+Code/cztfe" rel="nofollow">http://swik.net/Haskell/del.icio.us+tag%2Fhaskell/Programming+Praxis+%E2%80%93+Monte+Carlo+factorization+%C2%AB+Bonsai+Code/cztfe</a><br />
<a href="http://www.pubbs.net/python/200905/131284/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pubbs.net/python/200905/131284/</a></p>
<p>and so on</p>
<p>hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Miller</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If &quot;programming praxis&quot; was such a common name, the domain wouldn&#039;t have been available.  Not being a lawyer, I don&#039;t know what your odds of succeeding are, but I wish you the best of luck.  It&#039;s an obvious copy of the name and idea IMHO.

If it&#039;s any consolation, I only heard of this site because of this post.  I used to read TDWTF religiously when it first started, but it&#039;s gone down hill since.  I still read it, I guess mostly out of habit, but I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s got much life left.

I would say you&#039;d be better off pursuing this, as it&#039;ll get you more readers, even if you don&#039;t win any legal settlement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8220;programming praxis&#8221; was such a common name, the domain wouldn&#8217;t have been available.  Not being a lawyer, I don&#8217;t know what your odds of succeeding are, but I wish you the best of luck.  It&#8217;s an obvious copy of the name and idea IMHO.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s any consolation, I only heard of this site because of this post.  I used to read TDWTF religiously when it first started, but it&#8217;s gone down hill since.  I still read it, I guess mostly out of habit, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s got much life left.</p>
<p>I would say you&#8217;d be better off pursuing this, as it&#8217;ll get you more readers, even if you don&#8217;t win any legal settlement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. &quot;Not a Programmer&quot;, how did you get the impression that Alex wanted &quot;to muscle someone into giving up a valuable property and it didn’t work&quot;? Giving up would imply Phil not using it anymore, i believe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. &#8220;Not a Programmer&#8221;, how did you get the impression that Alex wanted &#8220;to muscle someone into giving up a valuable property and it didn’t work&#8221;? Giving up would imply Phil not using it anymore, i believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: attorneyman</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[attorneyman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys,

Just wanted to say, as an attorney and legal historian, that there is such a thing as common law trademark.  Trademarks were protected by common law long before trademark statutes were enacted.  One need not register a mark or phrase to have a legally protectible interest therein.  It just needs to be unique, and based on a simple, seat of the pants google search I just did, it looks like it is.  I&#039;m not saying common law trademark protection is as strong as statutory, or that Phil wouldn&#039;t have been wiser to register Programming Praxix, I&#039;m just saying his claim of trademark is not invalid just because he didn&#039;t register it.  So all of you amateur attorneys out there need to back off a bit and rethink this thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>Just wanted to say, as an attorney and legal historian, that there is such a thing as common law trademark.  Trademarks were protected by common law long before trademark statutes were enacted.  One need not register a mark or phrase to have a legally protectible interest therein.  It just needs to be unique, and based on a simple, seat of the pants google search I just did, it looks like it is.  I&#8217;m not saying common law trademark protection is as strong as statutory, or that Phil wouldn&#8217;t have been wiser to register Programming Praxix, I&#8217;m just saying his claim of trademark is not invalid just because he didn&#8217;t register it.  So all of you amateur attorneys out there need to back off a bit and rethink this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to claim trademark infringement I&#039;m pretty sure you need a trademark to begin with and it&#039;s perfectly clear you don&#039;t have one. Using a term on your website does not automatically constitute a trademark (I commonly use words on my website, all sorts of them, but that doesn&#039;t automatically grant me a trademark on them - lucky for you because I&#039;ve seen hundreds of &quot;infringements&quot; of my words on this site). Stop acting like a butthurt little kid and get on with your life (I assume you have one of those although all evidence to the contrary).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to claim trademark infringement I&#8217;m pretty sure you need a trademark to begin with and it&#8217;s perfectly clear you don&#8217;t have one. Using a term on your website does not automatically constitute a trademark (I commonly use words on my website, all sorts of them, but that doesn&#8217;t automatically grant me a trademark on them &#8211; lucky for you because I&#8217;ve seen hundreds of &#8220;infringements&#8221; of my words on this site). Stop acting like a butthurt little kid and get on with your life (I assume you have one of those although all evidence to the contrary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Issarlk</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Issarlk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Way to go, you want to protect your imaginary property, that&#039;s not even trademarked. And you publish private conversations without consent, thus violating Alex&#039;s copyright.

Hopefuly you&#039;ll be less clueless next time something like this happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, you want to protect your imaginary property, that&#8217;s not even trademarked. And you publish private conversations without consent, thus violating Alex&#8217;s copyright.</p>
<p>Hopefuly you&#8217;ll be less clueless next time something like this happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arne</title>
		<link>http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/08/13/the-daily-wtf-maliciously-infringes-programming-praxis-trademark/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmingpraxis.com/?p=1181#comment-507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title says, TDWTF infringed your trademark, but from the body of this article it&#039;s clear that you have no trademark. While trademarks can be leveraged in domain name disputes, the converse is not true. This means that the claim you make in the title probably constitutes libel. Even if you have a moral case of some sorts, legally you are treading very thin ice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title says, TDWTF infringed your trademark, but from the body of this article it&#8217;s clear that you have no trademark. While trademarks can be leveraged in domain name disputes, the converse is not true. This means that the claim you make in the title probably constitutes libel. Even if you have a moral case of some sorts, legally you are treading very thin ice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

