## Carl Hewitt’s Same-Fringe Problem

### August 3, 2010

Long ago, Carl Hewitt created the *same-fringe* problem as a demonstration of the simplest problem that requires concurrency to implement efficiently: Given two binary trees, determine if they have the same leaves in the same order, regardless of their internal structure. A solution that simply flattens both trees into lists and compares them element-by-element is unacceptable, as it requires space to store the intermediate lists and time to compute them even if a difference arises early in the computation.

Your task is to write a function that tests if two trees have the same fringe. When you are finished, you are welcome to read or run a suggested solution, or to post your own solution or discuss the exercise in the comments below.

Pages: 1 2

[...] Praxis – Carl Hewittâ€™s Same-Fringe Problem By Remco Niemeijer In today’s Programming Praxis exercise we have to implement Carl Hewitt’s same-fringe algorithm, which [...]

My Haskell solution (see http://bonsaicode.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/programming-praxis-carl-hewitt%E2%80%99s-same-fringe-problem/ for a version with comments):

Here’s a Python solution using generators. Just for grins, I implemented seqsamefringe, which compares an arbitrary number of trees. Because cons cell is not a primitive type in Python, I implemented that, too.

Bug in your solution.

> (define (same-fringe? eql? tree1 tree2)

> (stream-equal? = (flatten tree1) (flatten tree1)))

should be

(stream-equal? = (flatten tree1) (flatten tree2))

Oooh, that’s embarrassing. Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out.

You might be interested in the solution in scriptJ(TM) at

http://arxiv4.library.cornell.edu/abs/1008.2748v1

Cheers,

Carl

Carl,

Thanks for the link. And thanks for visiting my corner of the web.

Phil