## Coin Change, Part 2

### May 21, 2013

We start by noting that the greedy algorithm doesn’t work, in general. If you’re target is 30 and the available coins are 1, 10 and 25, the greedy algorithm requires 6 coins (25 1 1 1 1 1) but the proper solution requires 3 coins (10 10 10). The greedy solution does work for U.S. coins, however; given coins 1, 5, 10 and 25, the greedy algorithm finds the proper solution (25 5) that requires 2 coins.

We’ll give the classic *O*(*kn*) algorithm, where *k* is the number of distinct coin denominations; there is also an *O*(*n*) algorithm similar to the one of the previous exercise. The idea is to build a *k* by *n* matrix with one row per coin denomination and one column per target that contains the minimum number (or list) of coins of denominations of the current row or the rows above that are required to make the total in the given column. For our sample target of 40 using coins of 1, 5, 10 and 25, the matrix looks like this:

` 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40`

1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

5 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 7 4 5 6 7 8 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10 11 8

10 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 4 5 6 7 8 4

25 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 3

The table entry tells the number of coins required to make the given total using only the available coins. For instance, in the third row, the available coins have denominations 1, 5 and 10 and a target of 18 requires 5 coins (10 5 1 1 1). The solution is in the lower-right corner: to make a total of 40 requires at minimum 3 coins (25 10 5) from the set 1, 5, 10 and 25.

The values in the matrix, which is traditionally called *C* with rows *i* and columns *j*, are filled left-to-right, top-to-bottom using the following algorithm:

C[i,j] isC[i-1,j] ifj<coin[i] or min(C[i-1,j], 1+C[i,j–coin[i]]) otherwise. In the limit, wheni= 0 andcoin[0] = 1,C[0,j] isj.

Note that we assume the smallest coin always has denomination 1, since otherwise there would be no way to make all possible targets. Here’s the program that computes the minimum count of coins:

`(define (count coins n)`

(let* ((k (vector-length coins))

(c (make-matrix k (+ n 1) 0)))

(do ((j 0 (+ j 1))) ((< n j))

(matrix-set! c 0 j j))

(do ((i 1 (+ i 1))) ((= i k))

(do ((j 1 (+ j 1))) ((< n j))

(matrix-set! c i j

(if (< j (vector-ref coins i))

(matrix-ref c (- i 1) j)

(min (matrix-ref c (- i 1) j)

(+ 1 (matrix-ref c i

(- j (vector-ref coins i)))))))))

(matrix-ref c (- k 1) n)))

We can determine which coins make up the solution by inspecting the matrix, starting at the lower-right corner. If the matrix value is the same as the one above, move up, because the value in the cell was calculated to be the same as the cell above. Otherwise, emit the current coin and move left in the matrix the same value as the coin. Stop when you get to the upper-left corner. In the case of our example, the value at the lower-right corner, 3, is different than the value above, 4, so emit a 25-cent coin and move twenty-five left to *C*[25,15]. The value there is the same as the value above, 2, so move up. Then the value differs from the value above, 2 compared to 3, so emit a 10-cent coin and move ten left to *C*[10,5]. The value there is the same as the value above, 1, so move up to *C*[5,5]. Now the value differs from the value above, 1 compared to 5, so emit a 5-cent coin and move five left to *C*[0,5]. The value there is the same as the value above, 0, so move up. And quit, since we’re at the upper-left corner.

`(define (coins cs n)`

(let* ((k (vector-length cs))

(c (make-matrix k (+ n 1) 0)))

(do ((j 0 (+ j 1))) ((< n j))

(matrix-set! c 0 j j))

(do ((i 1 (+ i 1))) ((= i k))

(do ((j 1 (+ j 1))) ((< n j))

(matrix-set! c i j

(if (< j (vector-ref cs i))

(matrix-ref c (- i 1) j)

(min (matrix-ref c (- i 1) j)

(+ 1 (matrix-ref c i

(- j (vector-ref cs i)))))))))

(let loop ((i (- k 1)) (j n) (zs (list)))

(cond ((and (zero? i) (zero? j)) zs)

((zero? i) (loop i (- j 1) (cons 1 zs)))

((= (matrix-ref c i j) (matrix-ref c (- i 1) j))

(loop (- i 1) j zs))

(else (loop i (- j (vector-ref cs i))

(cons (vector-ref cs i) zs)))))))

Here are some examples:

`> (count '#(1 5 10 25) 40)`

3

> (coins '#(1 5 10 25) 40)

(5 10 25)

We used the matrix procedures from the Standard Prelude. You can run the program at http://programmingpraxis.codepad.org/NeueOC2I.

Pages: 1 2

Here is a Ruby solution to find the fewest number of coins adding to a given total:

Here is the output:

Of course, a more optimal solution is to just use the maximum value of each coin count (where the coin value * coin count is still less than the current total). Exercise left to others.. :-)

As a note, the matrix solution is very similar in behavior to a recursive solution with memoization (as it is in general for most dynamic programming), and I usually prefer the recursive formulation.

In clojure:

This Python version returns the minimum number of coins and the change.

In this case you can use a greedy algorithm, as aks said: keep selecting the largest coin possible until you reach your target change.