Motzkin Numbers
September 14, 2021
[ I’ve had a couple of readers ask where I have been. I put in my retirement papers at work a few months ago, and will retire at the end of 2021. That sounds good, but setting up my post-retirement finances, learning about Medicare (it’s a huge mess) and deciding what to do with the rest of my life has been exhausting, and I still have a job to do. Here’s a simple exercise; I’ll try to be more regular about posting in future weeks. — Phil ]
Your task is to write a program to generate Motzkin Numbers (A001006). If you don’t like Motzkin numbers, pick any other sequence from the OEIS. When you are finished, you are welcome to read or run a suggested solution, or to post your own solution or discuss the exercise in the comments below.
Welcome back! Retirement is good, I recommend it.
Richard P. Stanley tells us that the Motzkin numbers are the first elements of successive differences of the Catalan numbers (counting from C₁):
so in Haskell:
Of course, that should have been motz, not moz:
Or maybe this is better as we avoid explicit recursion:
Here’s a solution in Python.
Output:
We are also told that Motzkin numbers count lists of {-1,0,-1}, length n, such that partial sums are >= 0, total sum == 0, so let’s have a function that generates all such lists and count the result:
Another nice connection with the Catalan numbers (https://oeis.org/A000108 – “This is probably the longest entry in the OEIS, and rightly so.”) – comment out the ‘0’ clause in the definition of f and apply to 2n instead of n:
Another Catalan connection: the Motzkin numbers count the number of correctly parenthesized words of length 2n, constructed from “((“,”()” and “))” (just substitute for 1,0,-1 in previous sequences), so Motzkin(n) <= Catalan(n).
A couple of solutions in Racket.